Skip to content
WPJury
No. 00446 Content

Tasty Recipes: worth it for serious food blogs, not casual recipe pages

The verdict Tasty Recipes is worth paying for if recipes are central to your WordPress site and you want polished cards, reliable recipe schema, migration tools, and reader-focused features without building them yourself. It is less compelling for a small personal blog because the paid plan renews at the regular rate and automatic nutrition calculation requires the separate Nutrifox service.
Recommended The ruling
Get v4.0.5

via WorldPressIT · complete package

Best for
  • Food bloggers publishing recipes regularly
  • Sites migrating from another recipe plugin
  • Publishers who need polished printable cards
  • Blogs focused on Google and Pinterest visibility
  • Creators wanting hands-free cooking features
Skip it if
  • You only publish a handful of recipes
  • You need built-in nutrition calculation
  • You require deeply customized PHP templates
  • You want a permanently free premium feature set
Version 4.0.5 Updated 14 Sep 2026 Licence GPL
Tasty Recipes: worth it for serious food blogs, not casual recipe pages screenshot

Tasty Recipes is one of the safer paid choices for a recipe-first WordPress site. It turns a recipe into a structured card with ingredients, instructions, photos, videos, ratings, nutrition fields, print controls, serving adjustment, US-to-metric conversion, ingredient checkboxes, and a jump-to-recipe link. The plugin also outputs Recipe Schema in JSON-LD, supports the Block Editor, Classic Editor, and Elementor, and includes a searchable Recipe Explorer for managing an older recipe library.

The strongest part is the reader experience. Recipe cards are clean on mobile, printable without the surrounding article, and practical while cooking. Hands-free Cook Mode can keep a device awake, while copy-to-clipboard, scaling to different serving counts, and ingredient checkboxes remove small frustrations that readers notice. The plugin also supports video embeds and How-To cards, so it is useful beyond food in some cases. Its built-in recipe taxonomies for category, cuisine, method, and diet are especially helpful for larger sites that want filtered recipe archives.

Migration is another genuine advantage. WP Tasty documents bulk conversion from several competing recipe plugins, including WP Recipe Maker, Create, Cookbook, Yummly Rich Recipes, and WP Ultimate Recipe. That makes Tasty Recipes a realistic option for an established blog rather than only a tool for new sites. The free Tasty Recipes Lite plugin covers the basics, including schema, recipe cards, print links, ratings, and three templates; the paid product adds the more polished workflow and broader feature set.

The main weakness is cost structure. The official pricing page lists the one-site Basic plan at a regular $99 per year, while showing a $49 introductory price; renewals are charged at the regular price. That is reasonable for a commercial food blog, but excessive for a hobby site with a few recipes. Nutrition is also not as complete as the feature list initially suggests. You can enter nutrition values manually, but automatic calculation is handled through the separate Nutrifox service. If nutrition analysis is central to your site, WP Recipe Maker is more attractive because its paid tiers include a more integrated nutrition workflow.

Customization is good but not limitless. The included templates can be styled with colors and CSS, but WP Tasty says custom PHP templates are not maintained by its team and must be updated manually when new card features arrive. Cook Mode also requires HTTPS and a compatible browser; the documented Wake Lock support excludes Firefox, and the feature is restricted to the Pro product. These are manageable limitations, but they matter for unusual stacks or older audiences.

Compared with WP Recipe Maker, Tasty Recipes feels more polished and editorially streamlined, while WP Recipe Maker offers deeper configuration and stronger nutrition options. Compared with WP Delicious, Tasty Recipes has a more established migration and support ecosystem, though Delicious can be a better fit if you want a broader free feature set. The verdict is straightforward: buy Tasty Recipes when recipe presentation and publishing efficiency directly support your business; use Lite, WP Recipe Maker, or another free option when minimizing recurring cost matters more than convenience.

Questions people ask

Is Tasty Recipes worth paying for?
Yes, for a serious food blog publishing recipes regularly. Its polished cards, schema, migration tools, print view, serving scaling, and reader features justify the cost more easily than they do for a small personal site.
Does Tasty Recipes calculate nutrition automatically?
Not by itself in the same way a dedicated nutrition calculator does. You can enter nutrition data manually, while automatic calculation is provided through the separate Nutrifox service.
Can Tasty Recipes import recipes from WP Recipe Maker?
Yes. WP Tasty documents bulk conversion from WP Recipe Maker and several other recipe plugins, although you should test the conversion on a staging copy before changing a large live site.
Does Tasty Recipes include recipe schema?
Yes. Tasty Recipes adds Recipe Schema and JSON-LD to recipe cards, helping search engines interpret ingredients, cooking times, ratings, and other recipe details.
Does Tasty Recipes work with Elementor?
Yes. The plugin supports Elementor as well as the Block Editor and Classic Editor, so you can add recipe cards without switching to a shortcode-only workflow.

Get Tasty Recipes: worth it for serious food blogs, not casual recipe pages 4.0.5

Complete package, ready to install, via WorldPressIT.

Download

Other rulings

The Voux: worth it for polished magazines, not flexible builds The Voux is worth buying if you want a visually finished fashion, lifestyle, or editorial magazine and are happy to build around WPBakery. It is not the best choice for a lean, block-first WordPress site or a publication that wants maximum speed, long-term flexibility, and minimal theme lock-in; Newspaper and GeneratePress are safer alternatives. Situational Qalam: worth it for magazine sites, not modern block-first builds Qalam is worth considering if you are building a traditional news, newspaper, or magazine site and want dense editorial layouts without designing every archive from scratch. It is not the best buy for a block-editor-first project or a site that needs a lightweight, future-proof foundation, because its strongest features depend on Elementor and the bundled WP Post Modules system. Situational PublishPress Revisions: worth it for controlled content updates PublishPress Revisions is worth using if your site regularly updates already-published content and those changes need review, approval, or scheduled release. The free version is unusually capable for core WordPress posts and pages, but the value drops sharply if you need reliable revisions for WooCommerce, ACF, Yoast SEO, Elementor, or other third-party data, because those integrations are reserved for Pro. It is a strong editorial workflow tool, not a general replacement for WordPress revisions, Google Docs, or a full publishing-suite plugin. Situational