Skip to content
WPJury
No. 00222 Analytics

GravityCharts: worth it for Gravity Forms dashboards, not general analytics

The verdict GravityCharts is worth buying if your site already runs Gravity Forms and you need polished, live-updating charts inside WordPress. It is not worth the cost for general-purpose analytics, multi-field reporting, or sites that do not already use the Gravity Forms ecosystem; in those cases, GFChart or an external reporting tool may be a better fit.
Situational The ruling
Get v1.20.2

via WorldPressIT · complete package

Best for
  • Gravity Forms survey owners
  • WordPress business dashboards
  • Client-facing entry reports
  • GravityView users
  • Developers needing Chart.js hooks
Skip it if
  • You do not use Gravity Forms
  • You need multi-field charts
  • You want broad website analytics
  • You only need occasional exports
Version 1.20.2 Updated 12 Sep 2026 Licence GPL
GravityCharts: worth it for Gravity Forms dashboards, not general analytics screenshot

GravityCharts is a focused reporting add-on for Gravity Forms, not a general WordPress analytics platform. It turns form entries into bar, column, line, area, pie, radar, polar-area, and timeline charts that can be embedded with a block, shortcode, image, or GravityView widget. Charts update as new entries arrive, which makes it useful for surveys, polls, lead breakdowns, customer feedback, registrations, and lightweight business dashboards. The current documentation lists support for fields including Checkboxes, Drop Down, Radio Buttons, Survey, Number, Poll, Quiz, and Multiple Choice fields. ([gravityforms.com](https://www.gravityforms.com/add-ons/gravitycharts/))

The strongest part is the editing experience. GravityCharts gives you a live preview while you configure colors, titles, legends, axes, labels, scaling, filters, and conditional logic. You can also chart counts, totals, averages, minimums, and maximums, or plot submissions over time. The result is considerably more presentable than a raw Gravity Forms entry list, and it can be placed directly into a WordPress page without building a separate dashboard application. Developers also get Chart.js-based hooks and filters for deeper customization. ([gravityforms.com](https://www.gravityforms.com/add-ons/gravitycharts/))

Its GravityView integration is particularly useful, but the marketplace description overstates the dependency. GravityView is not required for basic charts, blocks, shortcodes, or image embeds. It is needed when you want to place charts inside a GravityView front-end application and limit the chart to all View entries or only the entries visible after filtering and pagination. That integration is a genuine advantage for directories, internal tools, and client portals, but it should not be treated as part of the minimum setup. ([gravitykit.com](https://www.gravitykit.com/docs/gravitycharts/adding-a-gravitycharts-widget-to-gravityview/))

The limitations are important. Each chart currently uses data from a single form field, so it is not a replacement for a flexible business-intelligence tool that combines several dimensions on one visualization. The official FAQ also says a normal chart works across all entries or a filtered subset rather than automatically charting multiple fields together. Static image charts are useful in confirmations, notifications, and PDFs, but the image-generation feature relies on QuickChart and the documentation still labels related image-chart functionality as beta. ([gravityforms.com](https://www.gravityforms.com/add-ons/gravitycharts/))

Compared with GFChart, GravityCharts has the cleaner Gravity Forms interface, more modern configuration controls, stronger conditional logic, live previews, and chart types such as polar-area charts. GFChart remains a credible alternative if you need its established reporting workflow, templates, or a product built specifically around automatic charts and calculations. Compared with native Gravity Forms survey results, GravityCharts is much better for publishing attractive front-end visualizations, but it also adds another paid component to an already premium form stack. GravityKit lists the standalone add-on at $99 per year, while its All Access plan includes GravityCharts alongside other products. ([gravitykit.com](https://www.gravitykit.com/products/gravitycharts/?utm_source=openai))

Verdict: buy GravityCharts when the data already lives in Gravity Forms and the output needs to be visible, branded, and continuously updated inside WordPress. Skip it for serious cross-source analytics, complex multi-field reporting, or simple one-off charts where exporting to a spreadsheet will do.

Questions people ask

Does GravityCharts require GravityView?
No. GravityView is only required for the GravityView widget integration. You can create and embed standard GravityCharts charts with Gravity Forms and GravityCharts alone.
Can GravityCharts combine multiple form fields in one chart?
Not currently. Each chart uses a single form field as its data source, although filters and aggregate settings can refine the result.
Can GravityCharts show data over time?
Yes. Its timeline functionality can plot entry counts or numeric data by dates such as days, weeks, or months.
Can GravityCharts put charts in emails or PDFs?
Yes. It can generate static image charts for Gravity Forms confirmations, notifications, and PDF reports, although the image-chart workflow has beta-related caveats in the documentation.

Get GravityCharts: worth it for Gravity Forms dashboards, not general analytics 1.20.2

Complete package, ready to install, via WorldPressIT.

Download

Other rulings